What is more logical?

image

Any claim of option A, invalidates the laws of nature as we know them and as we rigorously tested them!

What is more logical? That the laws of the universe and nature and physics as we know about, change in favor of a specific person, or simply that this person had been mistaken in his description of the event he claims to be supernatural?

I am in favor of B, unless you want to demonstrate that in some conditions, the laws of nature can be violated so easily.

Advertisements

About Mike

Hello, I am an atheist because of reason and personal experience. I am a father of THREE lovely living kids and two dead embryos, married to a lovely Christian Catholic devoted woman. Yes, black and white can coexist as long as there is respect and love, which is something abstracted from any belief or religion. I do not claim absolute truth and not 100% sure that a God does not exist somewhere out there. The scientific method is what I use to connect to reality. If there is something I don't understand, then it is because i don't understand, not because god exists. In case you haven't noticed, I am a native Arab, and English is my third language (yes there is second language). I like reading the Bible and the Quran and the critics of both of them. I also love watching documentaries especially astronomy, cosmology, Quantum Physics, and new discoveries in science in general, and Physics in particular.
This entry was posted in Allah, Atheism, Belief, Bible, Christianity, God, Gospel, Islam, Jesus, Judaism, Quran, Reasoning, Religion, Science and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s